The questions related to risks and adaptation were selected to present the results and discussion of the survey. Overall, the results indicate that the sense of risk is based on the causal interpretations of events. There was ambivalence in the responses of adaptation to climate changes. For example, it was observed that On the other hand, responses such as: '[ Part of the interviewees somehow denied the risk they are exposed to and the reasons for such behavior are multifactorial: religious, economic, cultural and even the uncertainty about the weather phenomena and the mapping of risky areas.
They question the technical mapping or climate prediction models - as first considered by Beck in the context of nuclear accidents and diffuse risks, and subsequently related to climate change in his work BECK, Figure 5 a shows that out of the interviewees would have some degree of proactivity to look for solutions to reduce risks other than 'leaving it in God's hands'. It was observed in the risk perception survey that their answers about taking the responsibility to reduce or avoid the problems suggest that there is some involvement of the population to act on the risks it is exposed to.
However, some reports suggested that the respondents would not know what to do to avoid or reduce these risks. Therefore, the conceptual model considered an analysis at several levels: given a social group or an individual safeguarded from the problems already experienced in the everyday life lack of basic infrastructure, limited access to public facilities, housing at risk and with high degree of protagonism, they will probably be better prepared or adapted to reduce the risks they are exposed to, even if the likelihood of physical risk increases - Figure 5 b - called reduced vulnerability or situation A S a.
This sense or perspective must also be understood in a context of intermediate vulnerability or situation B S b. This situation, at least in the light of the results of the current study, indicates that approximately people would have some degree of protagonism. The third context - the increased vulnerability or situation C S c - points out to approximately people who responded that if they were at risk, they would leave it in God's hands. According to the results of the risk perception survey applied to the contextual vulnerability approach, Thus, they 'accept' living in the place and are willing to face the danger when someone warns them about it.
The risk is denied or simply not perceived by those subjected to it. However, they perceive the risk for their neighbors. In the light of examples also observed in countries other than Brazil [mostly in developing countries], the results suggest that there is still an incipient preparation to act in emergency situations, because these countries have not yet consolidated a 'culture of risk prevention'. Somehow, the protagonism or lack of it reflects the actions or attitudes of people towards the adaptation to problems they experience every year, especially in rainy summers.
Thus, it is worth reflecting about whether it is more appropriate to wait for another disaster with magnitude equal to or greater than that of Caraguatatuba - due to climate change or not - or to take precautionary measures to better socially and spatially distribute the population in the territory, by taking into consideration the social specificities as well as the environmental and geological conditions, besides the articulation of different land use planning instruments.
By considering the development model used in the study area and in other Brazilian cities as a possible background cause to the current problems, it is necessary to think about the issues that may not be internalized in people's perceptions, since they influence their protagonism to face the problems that already exist and those that may come to exist due to the effects of climate change. Rather than discussing the causes of these changes, we address the problem that is already experienced in the region in order to face the following situations: the recurring problems that have historical consequences as it was previously mentioned, see also Figure 4 b , and the future problems, which, although uncertain, may worsen the existing ones.
Thus, we go back to the discussion in Figure 2 with respect to actions focused on promoting an attentive and active political mobilization in order to perform effective social actions to solve the old problems and, thus, to reduce the risks. Obviously, these actions political and social must happen together and collectively. The paper intended to summarize the main concepts about risk, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change by following an interdisciplinary approach.
In addition, the study reflected on the analysis of vulnerability according to three interconnected axes physical risk, social vulnerability and protagonism for a population often facing physical environment risk situations. The protagonism axis may offer an opportunity to identify actions and encourage attitudes that promote a better understanding about how to respond to the problems. Guiding integrated and participatory work efforts may promote the involvement of the population in coping with and reducing risks arising from historically recurrent issues - poverty, socio-spatial segregation, and limited access of some social groups to basic urban infrastructure - or with those that are to come, such as climate change.
Global Environmental Change, v.
Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, v. Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, n. Modelos de vulnerabilidade social a desastres. In: S. Young; S.
- The Penguin Book of Card Games.
- Publications | Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability.
- Contributions to Ergodic Theory and Probability.
International Perspectives on Global Environmental Change , p. Pesquisa Interdisciplinar em Estudos Ambientais. In: I. Vieira, P. Santos Orgs. Geografia, v.
In: Bitar, O. Curso de Geologia Aplicada ao Meio Ambiente. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, v. BECK, U. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications. World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press, Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards.
Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environmental Hazards, v. At Risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London, Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environmental and Behavior, v. Practising interdisciplinarity in the interplay between disciplines: experiences of established researchers. A interdisciplinaridade e o enfrentamento aos desafios da sustentabilidade.
Sustentabilidade em Debate, v. CASH, D. Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change , v. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, v. Scale of climate impacts. Climatic Change , v. Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, v. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, v.
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. Risk and Blame: essays in cultural theory. New York: Routledge. Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, n. Orgs E. Ostrom e E. In: A.
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente , n. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia, n.
Numéros en texte intégral
Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente , v. Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear. Londres: Virgin, The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecological Economics, v. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, Urban poverty and vulnerability to climate change in Latin America.
Environment and Urbanization, v. Regions of risk: geographical introduction to disasters. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman, In: D. HUQ, S.
Community Capitals as Community Resilience to Climate Change: Conceptual Connections
Reducing risks to cities from disasters and climate change. Climate Change Synthesis Report. Cambridge University Press, , p. Ambiente e Sociedade, v. Tese Doutorado em Ambiente e Sociedade. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: J. Kasperson; R. Kasperson Eds. Global Environmental Risk. The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change. Vulnerabilidade: problematizando e operacionalizando o conceito.
In: Roberto do Carmo; Norma Valencio.
Cities and Climate Change
Cambridge University Press, Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press, Bridging scales and knowledge systems: concepts and applications in Ecosystems Assessment. In: W. Reid et al. Washington, DC: Island Press , Rio Claro-SP, a. VI Annpas. Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts?. Ecology and Society , v. Please choose whether or not you want other users to be able to see on your profile that this library is a favorite of yours.
Search WorldCat Find items in libraries near you. Advanced Search Find a Library. Your list has reached the maximum number of items. Please create a new list with a new name; move some items to a new or existing list; or delete some items. Your request to send this item has been completed. APA 6th ed. Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study.
The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied. The E-mail Address es field is required. Please enter recipient e-mail address es. The E-mail Address es you entered is are not in a valid format. Please re-enter recipient e-mail address es. You may send this item to up to five recipients. The name field is required. Please enter your name.
The E-mail message field is required. Please enter the message. Please verify that you are not a robot. Would you also like to submit a review for this item? You already recently rated this item. Your rating has been recorded. Write a review Rate this item: 1 2 3 4 5. Preview this item Preview this item. Series: Routledge studies in physical geography and environment , 4.