But it will then deserve a further enquiry whether the Duty of their former Oaths be consistent with such a meaning? That is, Whether their Oaths to the K. Such all must be who stand by Bp. Sanderson 's Principles, so much magnified by them who differ extremely from him in their Application. Ch 's disability to protect them, did any way excuse them from their Obligations to K. Let us therefore see whether these former Oaths did not Oblige them who took them, to be Active for the Interests of the Prince to whom they were made.
If they did, Two things will thence follow against the sense of these Swearers: 1. That, on the same parity of Reasoning, the same Oaths being made to the excluded K. The Government was then also already setled without K.
The Commendation Ceremony
And therefore by how much the more or less probable the returning of those Circumstances is, by so much the more a Promise or an Oath not to do what in those Circumstances we are obliged to do, will also be more or less excusable. But whilst the Controversie is depending, whilst the Right is on Legal and Ch. But if they would speak out, and express the limitation intended, how could they expect that such a taking the Oath could ever be accepted by the Imposers?
If they Swear and Promise more, that will be more than they can justifie by their own Principles, who both suppose their former Oaths to remain as obligatory now as ever, and to require more than an indifferent Neutrality, and to require active Endeavours for restoring the K.
This was the sense of our Ancestors, and is the sense of our Brethren, with whom we are at present dealing. Indeed, if by living peaceably they mean no more than Non-opposition, a perfect Neutrality would satisfie the Oaths on both sides, both to the K. By not contributing to the War against the K.
But it is strange how they can fall into such a mistake as this is. There is no doubt but the Possessor, whoever he be, will never be content with a bare Neutrality, but will expect active assistances from his liege Subjects, and this by vertue of their Allegiance and their Oaths.
- Hardback Editions.
- New Physiognomy of Jewish Thinking: Critical Theory After Adorno as Applied to Jewish Thought.
- The European Union and Multilateral Governance: Assessing EU Participation in United Nations Human Rights and Environmental Fora (Palgrave Studies in European U).
If they do not serve him in their own persons, they must at least do it by their Contributions for the maintaining others to do that duty for them. And what reason can they give, why Allegiance sworn to a K. But let us lay aside the Opinions of Men, and consider nakedly the things themselves. The Duty was very much the same as between the Liberti and the Roman Patrons. The Vassal therefore was obliged to help his Lord in all wars wherein he thought the Cause was just, or at least, doubted whether it might not be so.
In defensive wars he was to help him, whatever the Cause was, without Exception. If he did not, that was also an Ingratitude that forfeited his Tenure. And therefore the doing of it must undoubtedly have been a condition of it, and therefore a a particular of the Oath he was to take to his Liege Lord for the performance of Conditions.
Baen's Bar. About Baen.
Free Library. Monthly Bundles. Please login or sign up for a new account. Remember me not recommended for public devices. I forgot my password Password Reset. Sign up for a new account. Please select region, state or province. Outlying Islands U. Sign Up. View Series. More Info.
DragonBear History: Oaths of Fealty & Acceptances
Go to Cart Keep Shopping. Todos Santos causes resentment among Angelenos, but has improved their lives as well. The company that owns the arcology tows icebergs in, solving the water shortage for all Southern Californians. Todos Santos has dug a Los Angeles subway using a digging machine, which uses an oxyhydrogen torch. Todos Santos is at the hub of the subway system, and contains a huge mall, which Angelenos may visit. This easy access causes Los Angeles' city officials to complain about the shopping dollars and tax revenues going outside the city limits.
As the story opens, three young Angelenos sneak into the maintenance areas of Todos Santos. When they are detected by Todos Santos' security systems and personnel, they give every appearance of being terrorists, including spoofing the correct electronic access codes.
- The Medieval Oath of Fealty;
- Knowledge Structures for Communications in Human-Computer Systems: General Automata-Based (Practitioners).
- Concerning the Case of taking the New Oath of FEALTY and ALLEGIANCE With a DECLARATION, &c..
When non-lethal means of stopping the three fail, Deputy Manager Preston Sanders orders lethal gas released rather than risk a bomb going off. Two of the intruders are killed. They turn out to be youths, with high tech equipment and boxes with such labels as "bomb", but without the actual means of harming the arcology.
It soon turns out that they were duped by the "Friends of Man and the Earth" FROMATE , anti-technology zealots who want to see Todos Santos destroyed or abandoned, as a means of forcing the arcology to turn off its lethal defenses for a later real attack. The deaths of the two youths cause political problems. Sanders is charged with murder. While arcology manager Art Bonner is quite prepared to defy the city authorities, Sanders turns himself in.